EPA
Considering Bioaerosol Sampling
http://www.epa.gov/mold/moldcourse/chapter7/lesson2.html
"remember
that a negative sampling report must not be used in place of a visual survey. Factors such as barometric
pressure, inside and outside temperatures, activity levels, and humidity may dramatically reduce or increase the spore levels
within a building. Air sampling for mold provides information on what was in the air only for the moment when the sampling
occurred. It is important, therefore, that sampling not replace visual inspection."
Can your home inspector interpret your
lab results?
http://www.epa.gov/mold/moldcourse/chapter3/lesson3.html
"Sampling for mold should be conducted by professionals who have specific
experience in designing mold sampling protocols, sampling methods, and interpreting the results." EPA
"Experience in interpretation of results is essential.”
EPA
|
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH)
ACGIH Bioaerosols: Assessment and Remediation states [section 1.2.3]: Some organisms and
sources release aerosols as 'concentration bursts' which may only rarely be detected by limited grab sampling and may be masked
in measurements of long-term average concentrations. Nevertheless, such episodic bioaerosol releases may produce significant
health effects. -- thanks to S. Flappan for suggesting this citation.
"Spores are not always
airborne during sampling: Mold spores may not be in interior air at the time of the sample but may be present
in high levels at other times."
The book "Fungal Contamination" is considered one of
the best mold inspection resources documents in the country by professional mold assessors.
Fungal Contamination:
"A Manual For Investigation, Remediation And Control"
By: Hollace S. Bailey, PE, CIAQP, CIE, CMR
www.becifl.com
- "Anything can be toxic in high enough concentrations, even water! If
you drink too much water to quickly, your body fluids will become dilute. The result is tissue damage and death."
- "The overall visual observations made of the building must be considered in combination with the results
of any testing, to determine the overall condition of the building. Test results alone should
never be considered to give a definitive account of the building's condition."
-
"Testing is just another tool that provides us with information.
By itself, testing does not do anything, accomplish anything, or fix anything."
-
"Indoor
levels of fungal spores may also be elevated as a result of poor interior hygiene and housekeeping. This by itself, or in conjunction with inadequate air movement and filtration,
can easily result in elevated levels of spores both in the dust on surfaces (transitory) and in the air."
|
|
H A R V A R D U N I V E R S I T Y
Environmental Health & Safety
Indoor Environmental Quality |
http://www.uos.harvard.edu/ehs/ih/mold_tips.pdf
"Sampling
results are of limited value because mold concentrations inside and outside vary considerably, methods of collection and analysis
are not standardized and no widely accepted exposure guidelines exist."
http://www.inspect-ny.com/sickhouse/OutdoorMoldCounts.htm
"warm weather spore counts vary during the day as weather conditions (humidity, temperature, period after rainfall) affect
sporulation and spore movement.
American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH)
Section 2.4.2.2 of The ACGIH Bioaerosols: Assessment and Remediation offers: Investigators
should bear in mind that samples provide information about a site as it existed at the time tested. However, the findings
may not represent conditions at a time in the past or future, even the relatively recent past or near future. Changes in the
kinds, concentrations, and proportions of biological agents in the air can be rapid and substantial. -- thanks to S. Flappan for suggesting this citation.
"OPINION: There are severe
problems in the standard practice comparing indoor and outdoor spore counts to decide if a building has a mold problem."
|
http://www.inspect-ny.com/sickhouse/MoldTestNegatives.htm
Individual samples of particles in air show tremendous variation from minute to minute, making "ok" airborne mold spore
test results a thing to view with skepticism. Examples of factors which can cause an exponential difference in particle levels
in indoor residential air over short time intervals include: mechanical disturbance (walking across a carpet or moving a moldy
cardboard box), operation of hot air heating system or central air conditioning system, operation of other building fans,
particularly ceiling fans and vacuum cleaners, turning lights on and off, and opening or closing windows and doors
"Risk of false negative
mold tests: Experienced mold contamination investigators should have little confidence that a one-time low
or "ok" "toxic mold test spore count" is an assurance that problematic particles are not present."
|
MoldReport™
http://www.moldreport.com/mold_faq.html
"A professional
mold inspector does not rely only on air sampling results to decide whether or not a home has a mold problem. Carefully conducted sampling is combined with visual inspections and discussions with the homeowner.
In addition, many different factors affect the reliability of an air sampler. The professional mold inspector understands
these variables and accounts for them in the sampling plan."
|
University of Minnesota fungal experts
http://www.inspect-ny.com/sickhouse/OutdoorMoldCounts.htm
"The University of Minnesota
fungal experts observe that an outdoor-baseline comparison to indoor air is not valid when the outdoor sample was taken during
or immediately after precipitation (spore counts plummet outdoors in the rain and might soar right after it),"
|
New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Bureau of Environmental & Occupational Disease
Epidemiology
Guidelines
on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi in Indoor Environments
2.1 Visual Inspection
"A
visual inspection is the most important initial step in identifying a possible contamination problem."
|
Martin Yerfino, CIE
Many Mold inspection companies
only perform "Mold Testing". Mold testing should not be confused with a Mold Inspection.
Mold testing refers to collecting air or surface samples which are analyzed by a laboratory, this procedure will only determine
the mold spore count and spore identification. This process will not help determine what caused the problem, the source
or the solution to it; but is very helpful when performed in conjunction with a full inspection.
A mold inspection report should at least include:
· Air and or surface sampling · Findings of visual
assessment · Boroscope inspection · Air Conditioning test and inspection · Identification of
water intrusion sources · Relative Humidity and condensation readings
· infrared thermal imaging inspection · Particle counts · Building pressure
test · Moisture detection ·
Prevention and correction Recommendations
|
We feel that a buyer’s
request for mold remediation should only be performed based on a written mold assessment report from a qualified Indoor Environmental
Professional (IEP or CIE or CIH or CMI) that has determined that mold growth or conditions conducive to mold growth (i.e.
wet building materials) exists within the subject property or if the indoor air quality conditions are not consistent with
normal fungal ecology that must include supporting documentation that identifies the source or at least the potential origin
resulting in the airborne amplification.
|
List of some of the factors that
can cause a False positive Mold Test:
"Conditions that Cause High Variation in Indoor Airborne Particle Levels"
http://www.inspect-ny.com/sickhouse/MoldTestVariables.htm
"A carpeted room with someone walking across the carpeting will produce a higher particle count than an un-carpeted room, other conditions
being equal."
"A room occupied by several people walking about or a bedroom with a child bouncing on a bed will produce higher airborne particle counts than the conditions
listed above."
"A room with windows open in a tall building will have considerably
more air movement (due to convection currents in the building)
and may have considerably higher airborne particle counts than when the window is shut."
"Outdoor mold counts are tricky to compare with
indoor mold spore counts because the same genera counted by a lab,
say Pen/Asp may both be the same genera (say Aspergillus but the species may be completely different,
making comparison of these two numbers meaningless."
|
Effects of
Biological Sampling on Real Estate Value Jeffrey Deuitch Microbiologist
& Mycologist Int'l Microbiology & Mold Group Palmetto, Fla.
http://www.ieconnections.com/archive/jan_06/jan_06.htm#article6
"The lack of support from the investigator
resulted in a buyer with many questions and no answers. In the spirit of "playing it safe" the buyer exercised a release from
contractual obligations. The deal was broken, but that was not the end of the ordeal. My friend's real estate agent, believing
that the results of the mold testing constituted a defect in the property, felt ethically obligated to disclose the existence
of the mold to all subsequent prospects."
"My
conclusions after examining the lab results, and after the inspector was contacted to explain the protocols employed, was
that the house did not have any defects and that the inspector implemented flawed protocols. Unfortunately by that
time, the damage was done."
|
Most Common Mistake For Outdoor Air Sample Collection.
Outdoor or base line air sample must be collected at least 10 feet from the structure according
to the Indoor Environmental
Standards Organization (IESO). This is the only standard for mold testing
approved by the American National Standards Institute.
Environmental Solutions Association (ESA) requires outdoor air sample
to be taken at least 5 feet from the structure. (good stanard but not approved by ANSI)
Common example of not following accepted industry standards:
Many Home / Mold Inspectors collect outdoor air samples on the
lanai or balcony (not to standard). This can possibly cross contaminate the outdoor sample,
resulting in a false spore count.
|
Line in the Sand
Megan Headley
Editor,
Moldmag
http://www.randrmagonline.com/RR/Home/Files/PDF/Mold2007_04_JulAug.pdf
"Is there any way to teach home inspectors enough about mold that they don't scare homebuyers with false alarms"
"As more than one person suggested, a home inspector can be compared to
a general practitioner (GP), while calling in the mold inspector is like visiting a specialist.
The GP may be able to get a sense that something is wrong with the patient, but it's up the specialist to perform tests to discover the real problem and its significance. The goal is to keep the GP from sending
the
patient running away in fear before the specialist can determine that those
headaches are really a result of minor dehydration, not of a massive tumor.
It's been said that a little bit of knowledge can be dangerous."
The Home Inspector mold "problem" is expected to disappear when the Florida Mold law becomes
effective. Texas passed a similar law a few years ago and eliminated the home inspector from mold assessment.
____________________________________________________________
2-11-2008
We have been asked by many people over the years
on “How the NABOR contract clauses for mold inspection and remediation should read?”
Most recent example: “This issue has created SO many problems in closing deals in an already
challenging environment. Buyer's agents give seller's agents test results and then say..."there's mold, FIX it!" or the buyer
won't buy. No identification of the problem areas or anything. The seller's are held hostage until they invest big money in
"remediation", many times offered by the company that found the mold issue for thousands of dollars. Many times the sellers
and buyers agent don't even know the cause, nor do the inspectors. Something’s not right here, this needs to be more
definitive and follow a consistent REALISTIC criterio n for remediation/evaluation. “
Reed and Associates
The goal is to get a proper mold assessment so that
remediation only occurs when necessary and that when remediation is performed, that it be performed to the nationally accepted
standard. This document is called the IICRC S520 Standard and Reference Guide fro Professional Mold Remediation.
We feel that a buyer’s request for mold remediation
should only be performed based on a written mold assessment report from a qualified Indoor Environmental Professional (IEP)
that has determined that mold growth or conditions conducive to mold growth (i.e. wet building materials) exists within the
subject property or if the indoor air quality conditions are not consistent with normal fungal ecology that must include supporting
documentation that identifies the source or at least the potential origin resulting in the airborne amplification.
We have seen all too often, situations where a seller
is presented with only air sample analysis from the buyer’s inspector and the buyer either walks away from the deal
or has the seller perform a remediation without knowing the source and extent of mold amplification which can lead to an unnecessary
remediation and a false mold stigmatization of the property. Further, if a remediation is performed that does not address
the source of the problem, a reoccurrence of mold growth is likely and potential legal ramifications may occur as well.
To avoid these situations, mold assessments must
always include the source and extent of mold amplifications with documentation and remedial recommendations from a qualified
IEP who carries Errors & Omissions Insurance so that there is accountability behind the evaluation.
The following definitions were excerpted from the
IICRC S520 and were provided with the intent of perspective.
Assessment: a process performed by an Indoor Environmental Professional
(IEP) that includes the evaluation of data obtained from an inspection to formulate an initial hypothesis about the origin,
identity, location and extent of amplification of mold contamination. If necessary, a sampling plan is developed, and samples
are collected and sent to a qualified laboratory for analysis. The subsequent data is interpreted by the IEP. The IEP or other
qualified individual may then develop a remediation plan.
Indoor Environmental Professional (IEP): an individual
that is qualified by knowledge, skill, education, training and/or experience to perform an assessment of the fungal ecology
of property, systems and contents at a job site, create a sampling strategy, sample the indoor environment, interpret laboratory
data and determine Condition 1, 2 and 3 status for the purpose of establishing a scope of work for remediation and verifying
the return of the fungal ecology to a Condition 1 status.
Mold Contamination: the presence of indoor mold growth
and/or mold spores, whose identity, location and quantity are not reflective of a normal fungal ecology for similar indoor
environments, and which may produce adverse health effects, cause damage to materials and/or adversely affect the operation
or function of building systems.
Post-remediation verification: an inspection and
assessment performed by an IEP after a remediation project, which may include visual, olfactory and/or sampling methodologies
to verify that the building, system or contents have been returned to a Condition 1 status.
Condition 1 (normal fungal ecology): an indoor
environment that may have settled spores, fungal fragments or traces of actual growth whose identity, location and quantity
are reflective of a normal fungal ecology for a similar indoor environment. […normal fungal ecology (i.e. types and
concentrations of molds typically found in non-water damaged, environmentally well-maintained structures, and reflective of
the ecological and climatic elements of the geographical region in which the building is located)]
Condition 2 (settled spores): an indoor environment
which is primarily contaminated with settled spores that were dispersed directly or indirectly from a Condition 3 area, and
which may have traces of actual growth.
Condition 3 (actual growth): an indoor environment contaminated
with the presence of actual mold growth and associated spores. Actual growth includes growth that is active or dormant, visible
or hidden.
Principles
of Mold Remediation,
There are five general principles used in the remediation of mold-contaminated
structures and materials. Applying these principles may require a multi-disciplinary approach involving professionals from
several fields of expertise.
Safety and
Health
When it has been determined that an indoor environment is contaminated with mold, remediation
workers must be protected from exposure hazards. Engineering controls are the primary means for preventing exposure. Appropriate
respiratory protection and/or other personal protective equipment (PPE) must be used to protect workers when engineering controls
are insufficient as indicated in 29 CFR 1910.134(a)(1). It is highly recommended that a reasonable effort be made to inform
occupants of and protect them from similar exposure as a result of investigation and remediation activities.
Project Documentation
It is highly recommended that environmental conditions and work processes associated with mold remediation be documented.
Assessment
When a preliminary determination indicates that mold contamination (as defined
in S520) exists or is likely to exist, it is highly recommended that an assessment (as defined in S520) be performed prior
to starting remediation. It is highly recommended that an independent IEP with no business affiliation to the remediator be
used for this purpose. In circumstances where an entire building or system is fully involved as a result of Condition 3 mold
contamination or when the scope of work can be determined without sampling or independent IEP inspection and assessment, engagement
of an IEP for assessment may not be necessary. Furthermore, some loss mitigation services may be initiated before or during
assessment of conditions and/or performance of remediation processes. Not withstanding the foregoing, if health issues are
discovered or apparent that seem to be related to the actual or suspected mold contamination, it is highly recommended that
an IEP or other appropriate professional be engaged by the property owner.
Pre-Remediation Documentation
It is highly recommended that the extent and Condition
(1, 2 or 3) to which areas of the structure, systems and contents are potentially mold-contaminated be determined and documented.
Documentation During Remediation
It is highly recommended that the conditions and
work processes be documented on an on-going basis during remediation work.
Post-Remediation
Documentation
It is highly recommended that the return of the remediated portion of the structure
and salvable contents to Condition 1 status be documented before the structure is rebuilt or the contents reused.
Contaminant
Control
It is highly recommended that the spread of mold contamination be controlled as
close as possible to its source. Methods of controlling the spread of contamination are further defined herein. Initial moisture
mitigation services may be performed to control amplification, while ensuring that mold contamination does not spread from
more-contaminated to less-or non-contaminated areas.
Contaminant Removal
Physically removing mold contamination is the primary means of remediation.
It is highly recommended that mold contamination be physically removed from the structure, systems and contents to return
them to Condition 1 status. Attempts to kill or encapsulate mold generally are not adequate to solve the contamination problem.
Contamination Prevention
To prevent recontamination or future contamination,
the moisture problem that contributed to the mold growth must be identified and corrected or controlled. It is highly recommended
that affected salvable materials be dried to acceptable moisture content following the current IICRC Standard and Reference
Guide for Professional Water Damage Restoration.
If anyone has questions or concerns, please contact us:
Radon & Mold Professionals
John Cosgrove CIE, CRMI
Doug Wall CIE, CRMI
239-498-4619
wallradon@comcast.net